Native

May 14th, 2012 by Sean

My Submission for the Australian Infront Virtual Response Competition.

It is based on a page from William Dawes’ notebooks from 1790, the first real documentation of the Aboriginal Language, Dharuk, from the Sydney area.

William Dawes had an incredibly interesting story, as I found on this amazing website. williamdawes.org

He came to Australia with the 1st Fleet as an astronomer, and ended up making the first serious attempt to document the native tongue in the form of 3 notebooks. Importantly, these also captured the sentiments of the Aboriginal people whose conversations he transcribed.

He was asked after some time in the service of the Governor Arthur Phillip to take part in a hunt to decapitate 10 Aboriginal men as revenge for the death of the Governor’s Gamekeeper. Dawes resisted but was eventually persuaded to join the pursuit. After the group returned unsuccessful he expressed his regret in participating and wouldn’t apologise to the Governor for this attitude, making him one of the first Europeans who stood in defence of Aboriginal interests. As a result, Dawes was returned to England, despite his great wish to remain in New South Wales.

He continued to undertake many honourable pursuits including setting up schools for the children of slaves in Antigua.

Whether William Dawes recognised it or not, I think that his documentation of the language would have played a major role in his moral objection. When you speak a foreign language you immediately have a cross cultural experience, and with these experiences you learn and show respect.

Pretty sure this isn’t a winning response, but it was an interesting theme to work with.

Naabangoon…

Tags: , , , , , ,
Posted in My Art | No Comments »

Movie time

April 30th, 2012 by Sean

These have nothing in common.

From Kick to Kill

I was there, it was really cool. Pretty visionary in the design world.

Lime Spiders – Weirdo Libido.

Picked this up on vinyl on the weekend. This was the first song played on rage, and it was on the soundtrack to Young Einstein.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Journal | No Comments »

I am a Graphic Designer. And I do some Art on the side.

April 26th, 2012 by Sean

I’ve been thinking about the distinction between the artistic and commercial aspects of what we do as designers. I haven’t come to any conclusions but here is what has been running through my mind.

There is occasionally the feeling, particularly in young designers (me) that more ‘commercial’ work offers less freedom of artistic expression. I suppose in some ways this is true. Corporate brand guidelines are generally more restricting, the tone more conservative and the outcomes often quickly absorbed into the everyday monotony of business and capitalism and our lives. But then, freedom isn’t a necessity for the creation art. Working within boundaries is a reality for anyone working creatively, no matter how FAR OUT you are. Art exists in provocation. An emotional shift caused by a composed number of elements within a boundary. These element might include the constraints of medium, colour, social class, budget, human perception, etc. and designers are communicating within these realities every day.

Design’s link to commerce is our artistic advantage.

Maybe it’s the fact that our work is directed by an outsider (a client) with their own set of goals and expectations as a customer that limits our artistic ownership. But most art is for sale and it’s value is determined within a commercial market of it’s own with the big players mostly linked to big corporations. Successful Art communicates truthfully whether someone pays for it or not. The value of design work is based on time and labour, but also creative or aesthetic expertise, which basically amounts to artistic skill. The fact that we are being paid for the outcomes of our art should mean that our art is more effective (has a greater effect).

I suppose you could think “But – being a designer is more than being artistic. There is marketing strategy, awareness of business, quoting etc” and you might be right. What frustrates me is that with clients, designers struggle to interact comfortably (at least in the majority of circumstances) as an artist. An artistic vocabulary can almost sound embarrassing, but it is these exact qualities – emotional, cryptic, abstract – that they are most importantly engaging graphic design services. It’s as though art is what we do alone, almost secretly in our studios – where graphic design is like a wall of financial assurity and sensible creative pragmatism.

I am of course speaking from the perspective of a designer working in Sydney, and maybe it is different elsewhere.

Tags: , ,
Posted in My Writing | No Comments »

J.Anniston

April 25th, 2012 by Sean

Drawing I did for my sister’s short story with the premise ‘Jennifer Anniston finding a lump on her breast’

Tags: , ,
Posted in My Art | No Comments »

What do you want from me?

April 22nd, 2012 by Sean

For designers it can feel as though marketing teams or business committees are a well intentioned pair of solid concrete boots. We as designers have all conceded our share of defeats at the hands of lower/middle/upper management as they try to tell us how to do our job. They would argue though, that they are just doing their job. For a real solution to this conflict, and to create more progressive, positive outcomes for design, business and society, we need to learn each others language and especially business needs to learn exactly what to expect from a graphic designer.

We aren’t supposed to be our clients, just as we expect them not to act as designers. Meaning we need a more mutual understanding of roles. It must be a partnership in which both parties are aware of their own and each others basic roles but I feel that it is the designer’s role that is more often sublimated.

The design industry as a whole has an identity crisis. We are strategy consultancies, advertisers, artists, activists, innovation hikers etc etc… amongst which ‘graphic designer’ could sound a bit dry. Whilst the role(s) of a graphic designer may seem broad, we need a coherent description of services that we share and that business can understand. Even designers who design exclusively for online should describe themselves as graphic designers to maintain this sense of consistency for the sake of the industry.

These transformations would take place slowly and require organisation and an a consensus within the industry. As well as improving the quality of the work, I think this would have other positive effects such as enabling designers to quote/charge with some consistency, find clients more easily, and once a job has been secured allow for it to run more smoothly. Articulation is key and we can start with the questions…

What should business expect and respect of graphic designers?

I propose something along the lines of:

  • Dedication to, and expertise in the field of aesthetics
  • Whilst being a service industry, we have our individual ideologies, ethics, and sense of purpose towards the improvement of society beyond answering a brief.

That is maybe a left of centre place to start, but maybe one day I’ll go into why I think these are the really important concepts that hold back our industry from job to job.

What should designers expect and respect of business (clients)?

I’d say this ball should be thrown in to the court of a ‘business-person’, but I’d say designers should expect a set of definable goals or motivations and for their responses to be challenged and held accountable.

Tags: , , , ,
Posted in My Writing | No Comments »